The Mets have planned a small video tribute for Jose Reyes on his first trip to New York as a visiting player when the Marlins come to town on April 24th—NY Daily News Story.
It’s no big deal either way. Like the supposed small gesture they may or may not have planned (we don’t know yet) for Chipper Jones when the Braves visit Citi Field for the final time in September, there’s nothing wrong with doing something nice and altering the perception of the club that had turned the Mets into a the type of place where players didn’t want to go unless they have no other choice.
Isn’t a solid reputation for treating players—theirs and others—kindly and professionally better than rampant dysfunction and disarray?
Like Jones, they’re not giving Reyes a car; they’re not retiring his number. If they’re doing it to draw a few more fans, so what?
Some have a problem with it though. One such person is Mike Francesa.
The WFAN host went into a blustery rant as to why the Mets have it backwards; how they never get it right; how they’re playing well and this adds another distraction from the team that they don’t need.
He can make his case and we can agree or disagree—it’s arguable—but his suggestion in lieu of a tribute was that of a psychopathic, spurned ex-boyfriend when he said that rather than give Reyes a tribute, they should throw a ball near Reyes’s head.
It would’ve been taken as his mouth getting away from him as he was opening his show and stirring the pot but for two things: he’s said stuff like this before; and he said it again a moment later with the idiotic assertion that Reyes should “get one in the chin when he comes up.”
This is not a new line of thought from Francesa. In the Little League World Series a few years ago, a player pointed toward the fence as if he was going to hit the ball out of the park and Francesa said that he, as a child, would’ve thrown the ball at the kid’s head.
He also suggested (off-air and according to another WFAN employee who was with him) that the Yankees throw at Reyes’s head after Reyes had homered twice at Yankee Stadium in June of 2010.
This headhunting obsession is disturbing and I wonder if Francesa feels the same way about all players or it’s Reyes who’s earned this bullseye on his helmet. Would it be okay if it was Derek Jeter? Alex Rodriguez? One of his favorites Bernie Williams?
Throwing at Reyes’s head is not only okay, but encouraged?
And what if the ball gets away from the pitcher and it sails into Reyes’s face? Or if the ball is close and Reyes leans forward instead of back and hits him in the helmet or the neck? What if it hits him in the eye?
What if it ends his career?
Is that retribution?
Because he chose to sign with the Marlins after the Mets didn’t make him an offer?
The Mets didn’t want him back, so what’s the logic behind this edict to try and hurt him?
The list of players whose careers have been damaged or destroyed by errant pitches that hit them in the head or face is vast. Off the top of my head, Al Cowens, Tony Conigliaro, Dickie Thon, Don Slaught and Adam Greenberg pop immediately to mind.
There are many others.
What would be accomplished by hitting Reyes? Would it prove something? I’m not seeing the logic.
It’s these bully-types like Francesa who consider themselves old-school and want to return to the 1950s and 1960s when pitchers owned the inside of the plate and there was no body-armor nor bench clearing brawls every time a pitch came close to them.
But the truth is that in spite of the reputations and being at or near the top of the league in hit-by-pitches for Don Drysdale, Sal Maglie, Bob Gibson and other more intimidating pitchers of the era, it was the threat of the inside pitch that was the weapon rather than the legitimate fear that they were trying to hit someone in the head.
It’s also those bully-types who would never follow through on these demands to “hit ‘im” if they themselves were asked to carry them out.
I’m old-school when it comes to retaliation. Sometimes it’s necessary in the big leagues and pitchers must pitch inside. But if you’re going to do it, don’t throw at the head. Most hitters, while disliking being drilled, will understand when it happens and they’re hit in the back or lower body. If it’s because their own pitcher was doing it to the opposition, that will be policed in-house.
But Francesa is old-school in name and ignorance only; he’s longing for a time when imbecilic would-be tough guys stalked the playground and exerted their will until they ran into someone tougher (as they invariably do); someone who didn’t talk, but acted.
For saying something like this, Francesa’s despicable and there’s no excuse.
2 thoughts on “Mike Francesa As The Psycho Ex-Boyfriend”
I joined Sirius Satellite when Howard Stern jumped from free radio in 2006. I have listened to Chris Russo “Mad Dog” since he joined in 2009. In my opinion? Chris Russo was the talent of Mike and the Mad Dog and without Mad Dog? Mike is a windbag who thinks he knows it all. Sort of reminds me of my Italian uncle who is always right and never wrong.
I’m not exactly a fan of Russo. He’s very mean-spirited and goes over the line in personal attacks. I don’t think he’s all that smart either.
Under all that bluster, Francesa’s a decent guy. His days as a radio force are gone and he’s trying to maintain relevance.