The Much Anticipated(?) Meeting Between Robin Ventura and Nolan Ryan

All Star Game, Ballparks, Basketball, Books, CBA, Cy Young Award, Draft, Fantasy/Roto, Free Agents, Games, Hall Of Fame, History, Hot Stove, Management, Media, MiLB, MLB Trade Deadline, MLB Waiver Trades, Movies, MVP, Paul Lebowitz's 2012 Baseball Guide, PEDs, Players, Playoffs, Politics, Prospects, Spring Training, Stats, Trade Rumors, Umpires, World Series

How the Robin VenturaNolan Ryan scrap from 19 years ago gained such cult status is understandable when you consider the ages of the participants at the time (Ventura was 26; Ryan 46) and that everyone has seen it as a highlight reel staple for nearly two decades.

Ryan, for all the worship he’s engendered over the years, was an ornery cuss on the mound with a reputation for throwing at hitters for the slightest transgression. Ventura, as a young player, had presumably heard the stories and when Ryan drilled him he knew it was done on purpose. The previous inning, Rangers’ outfielder Juan Gonzalez had been hit by White Sox’ pitcher Alex Fernandez, so it was obviously Ryan pulling old-school retaliation of “you hit my young star, I’ll hit your young star.”

It would’ve been interesting if Frank Thomas or Bo Jackson had come up to the plate instead of Ventura. Would Ryan have thrown at one of them?

Ventura charged the mound, Ryan got him in a headlock and hit him on the head with a few punches; several skirmishes broke out; then everything calmed down. Then it started up again.

You can watch the clip below.

The two had never crossed paths since the incident and it grew into something more than what it was—a run of the mill baseball fight.

But it’s not something that should be remembered along the lines of John Roseboro being clobbered on the head by Juan Marichal’s swinging bat; nor is it on a level with “The Punch” when NBA player Kermit Washington nailed Rudy Tomjanovich and knocked him to the hardwood floor with such force that Tomjanovich hit his head and nearly died.

Roseboro and Marichal eventually made their peace and that was a big deal.

Washington and Tomjanovich also made their peace and that was a bigger deal.

In the context of legitimately dangerous fistfights in the heat of competition, the Ventura-Ryan fight was a diversion that’s gotten far more attention than it deserved and that’s continued to this day. Maybe now it can stop.



What To Expect From the New Dodgers’ Ownership

All Star Game, Ballparks, Basketball, Books, CBA, Cy Young Award, Draft, Fantasy/Roto, Free Agents, Games, Hall Of Fame, History, Hot Stove, Management, Media, MiLB, MLB Trade Deadline, MLB Waiver Trades, Movies, MVP, Paul Lebowitz's 2012 Baseball Guide, PEDs, Players, Playoffs, Podcasts, Politics, Prospects, Spring Training, Stats, Trade Rumors, Umpires, World Series

Dodgers’ owner Frank McCourt selected a group led by former Los Angeles Lakers star and NBA Hall of Famer Magic Johnson and former Braves, Nationals and Atlanta Hawks team president Stan Kasten as the winning bidder to purchase his team—NY Times Story.

It’s a good choice to return the Dodgers to glory on and off the field and reclaim their place as one of the most star-studded, glamourous and stable franchises in baseball.

Here’s why:

Star power and ruthlessness.

Magic Johnson wasn’t just one of the greatest basketball players in history. He was glitzy; he was clutch; he was fearless; and he was ruthless. That has extended into his post-athletic career as he dealt with HIV and became a brilliant and successful businessman.

Magic isn’t simply a smiling face who knows everyone in L.A. and can gladhand at parties as a prize showhorse. It was Magic who, in 1982, orchestrated the ouster of coach Paul Westhead in favor of Pat Riley. He was a brutal competitor and transferred that into his battle against a dreaded disease that many thought would kill him within five years and into the business world.


Kasten has helmed and helped turn around moribund franchises three times and the Dodgers are going to be the fourth.

He installs quality people and lets them do their jobs while allowing them the freedom to spend money on the big league product and build through the draft.

With Magic and Kasten, the speculation will be that they’re going to want a “name” GM to run the team. Current Dodgers’ GM Ned Colletti has an out in his contract following this season if there’s an ownership change.

One thing I don’t want to hear is the inevitable mentioning of the name Billy Beane to run the Dodgers.

The only people who want Beane are the media members and the Hollywood types who either don’t know or don’t want to know the true scope of Beane’s work with the Athletics—that he’s a propped up character whose true resume bears no resemblance to the falsehoods and contradictions in Moneyball.

They’d be better off hiring Brad Pitt.

Old school flavors and swagger.

The easy storyline will be that the Dodgers are going to find some young, impressively educated “genius” to take over the franchise and rebuild it from top-to-bottom.

The only name I would pursue toward that end would be Andrew Friedman.

Johnson won’t want to deal with some young kid walking in and whispering sweet nothings in his ear about how much cheaper and better the Dodgers are going to be. Johnson will want someone who’s competent in being the front man for the club with swagger and charm while simultaneously running the organization correctly and not to generate headlines as the new “genius”.

Kasten worked with older GMs Bobby Cox, John Schuerholz and Mike Rizzo and, barring Friedman (who I think is a viable possibility), they’ll hire a veteran baseball guy with automatic name recognition and a track record.

Bolstering the foundation; stability and recognizability in the manager’s office.

Going back to their initial years in Los Angeles, the “Dodgers Way” was to have stability in the manager’s office with Walter Alston and Tommy Lasorda; a group of players that they could build around; and smart free agent signings.

With Matt Kemp and Clayton Kershaw, the Dodgers already have top-level stars on both sides of the ball. Once you have that, two giant pieces of the puzzle are in place.

Given the circumstances, Don Mattingly has done an admirable job as the manager and will deserve another chance elsewhere, but I would expect Magic will have a historical Dodger in mind to take over the team on the field. Lasorda has forever pushed one of his favorite players as a potential manager and, in spite of my general belief that pitchers aren’t my first choice as managers and inexperience is a definite negative, I’d make an exception in one case: Orel Hershiser.

Hershiser carried the Dodgers to the World Series in 1988—something Magic saw first hand—with 59 straight scoreless innings and post-season dominance in upsetting the Mets and A’s; he’d be a perfect choice on and off the field.

A rapid return to prominence.

The McCourt tenure was embarrassing for the revelations that the team was used as a virtual cash machine to fund a lavish lifestyle for the owners; the Bryan Stow beating was a horrible example of ignorance to ancillary factors—safety—that make an organization fan friendly and sound.

On the field, the product was actually quite good. McCourt’s Dodgers made the playoffs in 2004, 2006, 2008 and 2009 and with a little luck could’ve won a championship or two.

But he’s leaving.

Magic and Kasten are going to learn from the Dodgers’ history—the good and bad—and follow the historical blueprint that made them this valuable in the first place. They’ll return to what made the Dodgers what they were and it’s going to happen as early as 2013.


I’ll be a guest with Mike Silva of New York Baseball Digest tonight at 8 PM EST talking about my book, Paul Lebowitz’s 2012 Baseball Guide.

Click here to check it out.


2012 Preview—Toronto Blue Jays

All Star Game, Ballparks, Basketball, Books, CBA, Cy Young Award, Draft, Fantasy/Roto, Free Agents, Games, Hall Of Fame, History, Hot Stove, Management, Media, MiLB, MLB Trade Deadline, MLB Waiver Trades, Movies, MVP, Paul Lebowitz's 2012 Baseball Guide, PEDs, Players, Playoffs, Politics, Prospects, Spring Training, Stats, Trade Rumors, Umpires, Uncategorized, World Series

Toronto Blue Jays

2011 Record: 81-81; 4th place, American League East

2011 Recap:

The Blue Jays are simultaneously developing their young starting pitchers and putting together an offense and bullpen that can compete in an impossible division.

Manager John Farrell showed his inexperience as a rookie by allowing his baserunners to run and attempt to steal bases with reckless abandon.

Jose Bautista had his second straight MVP-quality season. Brett Lawrie emerged as a notable rookie and possible future star. But the inconsistent offense and growing pains of the young pitchers led to a season of undeniable mediocrity at the bottom line with an 81-81 record and 4th place.


RHP Sergio Santos was acquired from the Chicago White Sox.

RHP Francisco Cordero signed a 1-year, $4.5 million contract. (Reds)

OF Ben Francisco was acquired from the Philadelphia Phillies.

LHP Darren Oliver signed a 1-year, $4 million contract with 2013 club option.

RHP Jason Frasor was acquired from the Chicago White Sox.

C Jeff Mathis was acquired from the Los Angeles Angels.

RHP Jim Hoey was selected off waivers from the Minnesota Twins.

LHP Aaron Laffey signed a minor league contract.

RHP Jesse Chavez was selected off waivers from the Kansas City Royals.

INF Omar Vizquel signed a minor league contract. (White Sox)

LHP Trystan Magnuson was purchased from the Oakland Athletics.

RHP Rick VandenHurk signed a split contract. (Orioles)

SS Jerry Gil signed a minor league contract.

RHP Cole Kimball was selected off waivers from the Washington Nationals.

RHP Andrew Carpenter was selected off waivers from the San Diego Padres.

INF Luis Valbuena was purchased from the Cleveland Indians.

RHP Robert Coello signed a minor league contract.

INF Brian Bocock signed a minor league contract.


RHP Frank Francisco was not re-signed. (Mets)

RHP Jon Rauch was not re-signed. (Mets)

C Jose Molina was not re-signed. (Rays)

OF Adam Loewen was not re-signed. (Mets)

LHP Brad Mills was traded to the Los Angeles Angels.

RHP Nestor Molina was traded to the Chicago White Sox.

LHP Wil Ledezma was not re-signed. (Dodgers)

OF Darin Mastroianni was claimed off waivers by the Minnesota Twins.

RHP P.J. Walters was not re-signed.

OF Dewayne Wise was not re-signed. (Yankees)

INF/OF Chris Woodward was not re-signed.

INF Jayson Nix was not re-signed. (Yankees)

RHP Shawn Camp was not re-signed. (Mariners)

INF/OF Mark Teahen was released. (Nationals)

2012 PROJECTED STARTING ROTATION: Ricky Romero; Brandon Morrow; Henderson Alvarez; Brett Cecil; Carlos Villanueva; Kyle Drabek.

2012 PROJECTED BULLPEN: Sergio Santos; Francisco Cordero; Jason Frasor; Darren Oliver; Casey Janssen; Dustin McGowan; Jesse Litsch; Luis Perez; Joel Carreno; Jesse Chavez.

2012 PROJECTED LINEUP: C-J.P. Arencibia; 1B-Adam Lind; 2B-Kelly Johnson; 3B-Brett Lawrie; SS-Yunel Escobar; LF-Eric Thames; CF-Colby Rasmus; RF-Jose Bautista; DH-Edwin Encarnacion.

2012 PROJECTED BENCH: OF-Ben Francisco; C-Jeff Mathis; OF/DH-Travis Snider; OF-Rajai Davis; INF-Mike McCoy.

2012 POSSIBLE CONTRIBUTORS: INF-Omar Vizquel; C-Travis D’Arnaud; LHP-Aaron Laffey; RHP-Jesse Chavez; RHP-Jim Hoey; LHP-Trystan Magnuson; INF-Luis Valbuena; LHP-Evan Crawford; RHP-Alan Farina; RHP-Danny Farquhar; INF-David Cooper; SS-Adeiny Hechavarria; OF-Moises Sierra; RHP-Rick VandenHurk.

FANTASY PICKS: RHP-Carlos Villanueva; RHP-Brandon Morrow; RF-Jose Bautista; 3B-Brett Lawrie; SS-Yunel Escobar.


Early last season, GM Alex Anthopoulos was the newest member of the media-anointed “genius” club.

Yes, he was remarkably clever in somehow managing to get the Angels to take Vernon Wells and almost his entire contract off the Blue Jays’ hands, but that didn’t make him a genius. He lost the “genius” label almost immediately by trading the player he got in the Wells deal, Mike Napoli, to the Rangers for mediocre reliever Frank Francisco.

Anthopoulos is a good, smart and aggressive young GM. But he’s not a genius.

There’s a constant movement to name someone as a “genius” and this particular time it was Anthopoulos.


Is it for the sake of a story? Is it because for there to be an idiot, there has to be a genius and they’re interchangeable?

I don’t know.

But what I do know is that a baseball executive is only as good as the moves he makes. The perception of “good” or “bad” GMs is determined based on what passes as “analysis” from the masses, but the majority of the masses don’t know what they’re talking about. So what’s the appellation of “genius” worth?

If what a GM does makes sense, then he’s got a foundation to keep his job. If not, he doesn’t.

It’s that simple and has little to do with results. If a move makes sense and it fails, he shouldn’t be criticized for it after the fact.

The Blue Jays needed a bat this winter and didn’t get it. They looked into Prince Fielder and his demands for years and dollars were too pricey for the Blue Jays.

Instead, they’re making do with the moves they made in a frenzied flurry last summer when they acquired Colby Rasmus from the Cardinals and Kelly Johnson from the Diamondbacks.

They could’ve used a starting pitcher as well, but their bid for Yu Darvish fell short after a few days in which it was rumored that they’d won the bidding. Interest in Roy Oswalt was not reciprocated. Instead, Anthopoulos beefed up the bullpen with the re-acquisition of Jason Frasor; the signings of veterans Darren Oliver and Francisco Cordero; and the trade for Sergio Santos.

The moves make sense.

Whether or not they’ll work is the question and determinative factor for the masses to judge Anthopoulos.

John Farrell is still learning how to manage in the big leagues and the Blue Jays overaggressiveness on the bases cost them runs last season. Capricious stolen bases are the opposite of what I would assume Farrell had been exposed to while he was pitching coach for the Red Sox and I don’t understand why he allows his baserunners such leeway especially with an all-world basher like Jose Bautista in the middle of the lineup.

Farrell is well respected and knows how to handle the pitching staff, but he has to improve his in-game strategies and running the lineup. He exhibited some of the same strengths and weaknesses that Bud Black has shown as Padres manager and the absence of experience in manipulating the lineup and offensive strategies are why I would be very reluctant to hire a former pitching coach as a manager.

The Red Sox were interested in possibly having Farrell replace Terry Francona and the Blue Jays had a strange policy of allowing people under contract the option of leaving if that’s what they chose to do. This public disclosure lasted for a few days until the widespread indignation at such as bizarre policy spurred them to backtrack and say the Red Sox could not speak to Farrell.

If the Blue Jays are going to improve from their 2011 record of 81-81 (the essence of mediocrity), their manager is going to have to improve as well.


Ricky Romero was selected in the 2005 draft one slot ahead of Troy Tulowitzki. Obviously most teams would prefer to have the shortstop, but it’s not as if Romero is a bust. He’s become a top of the rotation starter whose innings have increased year-by-year in his three big league seasons. Now he’s a 220-inning man and had a fine season in 2011 going 15-11 with 176 hits allowed and 178 strikeouts. Romero is predominately a ground ball pitcher who benefited from the Blue Jays good infield defense and had a BAbip of .245 that’s going to be hard to repeat.

Romero has been compared to Johan Santana because of his fastball/changeup combination and deceptive motion. With a little bit better support from his offense, Romero would easily have won 20 games in 2011 and is a good bet to break out and become a household name in 2012.

The Blue Jays have rebuilt Brandon Morrow’s motion and confidence after a disastrous tenure with the Mariners in which he was jerked from the starting rotation and bullpen and had to live with the ignominy (through no fault of his own) that Giants’ star Tim Lincecum—from the University of Washington—was passed over in the draft in favor of Morrow.

He’s shown flashes of unhittability and racked up the strikeouts, but if the Blue Jays are going to contend, they’re going to have to take the shackles off of Morrow and he’s going to have to be durable and consistent.

The Blue Jays signed him to a contract extension for 3-years and $21 million with a club option at $10 million for 2015.

Now they need him to produce.

Morrow struck out 203 batters in 179 innings in 2011, but he’s still a work in progress. There are games that Morrow gets crushed and allows crooked numbers in bunches and it blows up his ERA.

In 2012, Morrow has to come close to 200 innings and slide in behind Romero as a legitimate co-ace. He has the stuff to do it, but he must harness his brilliant stuff with consistency, command and control.

As Morrow goes, so go the Blue Jays.

Righty Henderson Alvarez made his big league debut in 2011.

Alvarez was an undrafted free agent signed in 2006 and was impressive in 10 starts as a rookie. He’ll be 22 in April. His control and maturity stand out for someone so young. He walked 8 hitters and struck out 40 in 63 innings and wasn’t intimidated by being in the big leagues.

He changes speeds and has a wide array of pitches including several variations on his fastballs, a cutter, a slider and a changeup. He’s willing to pitch inside and has a plan to attack the hitters and executes it.

Jim Palmer used to say that pitching is a matter of getting ahead in the count and expanding the strike zone. That’s what Alvarez does.

Brett Cecil went 15-7 in 2010 but wound up back in the minors after an awful start in 2011. He pitched better after his recall in late June and was undone by a few more bad starts and a lack of run support. His season ended with similar across the board numbers as what they were in 2010, but his record in 2011 was 4-11.

The lefty doesn’t have overpowering stuff, loses the strike zone and is prone to giving up homers.

After spending the majority of his career as a reliever with the Brewers and Blue Jays, Carlos Villanueva moved into the starting rotation for 13 starts in the summer and acquitted himself well. He has the starter’s arsenal of four pitches—fastball, curve, slider, changeup—and, as long as he throws strikes, could do the job serviceably.

Villanueva has been a decent middle-reliever as well, so the Blue Jays have options on where and how to use him.

Kyle Drabek pitched reasonably well for a rookie into June, got knocked around in three starts and was sent back to the minors. He was recalled in September and pitched out of the bullpen. His numbers look far worse than they actually were with an ERA over 6. After he was sent down, he got pounded in Triple A Las Vegas with an ERA over 7 and a woeful hits/innings pitched ratio of 111/75.

He’s only 24 and his pedigree as the son of former NL Cy Young Award winner Doug Drabek is beyond reproach. Eventually, he’s going to be a very good starting pitcher in the big leagues. If it’s in 2012, the Blue Jays are going to make a playoff run, if not he’s eventually going to be part of a young, deep starting rotation with Romero, Morrow and Alvarez.


After allowing both their closer Frank Francisco and set-up man Jon Rauch to depart (for the Mets), the Blue Jays traded for White Sox closer Sergio Santos and signed veteran former closer Francisco Cordero. Santos is going to start the season as Blue Jays’ closer.

Santos is an interesting story.

Drafted in the 1st round in 2002 as a shortstop by the Diamondbacks, he wasn’t such a bad hitter that it became obvious that he should either quit or find another position. He had power and that lightning arm. In December of 2005, Santos was traded to the Blue Jays along with Troy Glaus for Orlando Hudson and Miguel Batista. Still playing shortstop, he stagnated in Triple A and in 2008, the Twins selected him off waivers. He batted .228 for the Blue Jays’ and Twins Triple-A clubs and became a free agent.

In 2009, the White Sox signed him and made him into a pitcher.

He pitched in 26 minor league games at four different levels in that one year, posted an 8.16 ERA and 20 walks and 37 hits in 28 innings. He also struck out 30.

Making the White Sox roster as a relief pitcher in 2010, he appeared in 56 games and struck out 56 in 51 innings. By 2011, after Matt Thornton faltered in the closer’s role, Santos took over and saved 30 games. He struck out a ridiculous 92 batters in 63 innings and, because he spent so much time as a shortstop, he doesn’t have the wear and tear on his arm a full-time pitcher would.

He’s still learning how to pitch and loses the strike zone, but he has a power, moving fastball, a changeup and a slider and can be a dominant closer once he grows accustomed to the role and actually being a pitcher.

Veteran righty closer Francisco Cordero was left out in the cold during this winter’s saturated market for closers and took a 1-year deal from the Blue Jays to function as a set-up man/tutor/insurance for Santos.

Cordero no longer throws as hard as he once did and doesn’t strike out as many batters, but he’s a competent veteran reliever. He can be prone to the occasional longball, but deals well with both righties and lefties and will benefit from the Blue Jays solid infield defense.

Jason Frasor was sent from the Blue Jays to the White Sox amid the mid-season deals Anthopoulos made last summer. A longtime Blue Jay who was a durable, effective and versatile reliever, they reacquired him on New Year’s Day for two minor leaguers. Frasor strikes out around a batter per inning, is more effective against righties than lefties, but can get lefties out as well.

To the best of my recollection, Darren Oliver talked about retiring in 2006 after the Mets cut him late in spring training and only decided to keep pitching after the Mets changed their minds and brought him back.

That was six years ago.

Since then, he’s gone from the Angels to the Rangers and now to the Blue Jays. Going to Canada, he certainly can’t claim that he’s going to pitch as long as he’s near home.

The 41-year-old lefty is still a highly effective long reliever who, like the other relievers in the Blue Jays’ bullpen, can get out both lefties and righties. Having pitched in the hitters’ heaven of Texas, Oliver only allowed 7 homers combined in his two seasons with the Rangers.

He’s a solid and respected veteran pitcher and a positive, professional presence in the clubhouse.

Righty Casey Janssen has developed into a good reliever after missing the entire 2008 season with a torn labrum. Janssen is a ground ball pitcher who will benefit from the Blue Jays’ solid infield defense and only allowed 2 homers in 55 games in 2011. He has a wide arsenal of pitches, good velocity and, as appears to be a trend for Blue Jays’ relievers, he can get out both righties and lefties.

Dustin McGowan nearly had his career destroyed by shoulder injuries but made it back to the big leagues and in four September starts working on a limit of 80 pitches, he was able to reach the mid-90s with his fastball and showed promise in returning to some semblance of effectiveness.

Injuries—a torn hip labrum and shoulder problems—sabotaged Litsch just as it did Janssen and McGowan. He returned in 2011 to appear in 28 games, including 8 starts. Litsch’s stuff has never been overpowering, but he battles and pounds the strike zone. Now, in spring training, the injury bug has hit him again. Litsch had an infection in his shoulder from the site where platelet rich plasma was injected to speed his recovery from shoulder inflammation. He’s going to miss at least 6 weeks.

Lefty Luis Perez spent his career in the minor leagues as a mediocre starter and may have found a home in the Blue Jays bullpen in 2011. He can reach the mid-90s with his fastball and has a slider and changeup.

25-year-old righty Joel Carreno has put up massive strikeout numbers in the minors. He has a 90 mph fastball, a sharp-breaking slider, a cutter, a changeup and a curve. His stuff and minor league results profile him as a starter, but his strikeout numbers in the big leagues (14 in 15 innings) and 325 in 271 minor league innings in 2010-2011 show that he could be a useful arm out of the bullpen.

Jesse Chavez was claimed off waivers from the Royals. Chavez was somewhat effective as the nominal closer for Triple-A Omaha in 2011 and will be an extra arm for the Blue Jays. He’s never pitched as well as his stuff indicates he should.


After the season he had with the Rangers, I’m wondering if the Blue Jays are regretting trading Mike Napoli for Frank Francisco days after acquiring him for Vernon Wells.

Sure, they had J.P. Arencibia “ready” for the big leagues and Travis d’Arnaud on the way up, but Napoli had 30 homers and a 1.046 OPS for the pennant-winning Rangers; he also threw out 36% of basestealers.

Arencibia on the other hand, hit 23 homers and did little else of use. He threw out 24% of basestealers (exactly what he’d posted in his final two minor league seasons); batted .219 with a .282 OBP and struck out 133 times. He had a .255 BAbip, so maybe he was hitting in a bit of bad luck, but slightly better luck wouldn’t repair his poor defense or rampant strikeouts.

It wouldn’t surprise me if, once d’Arnaud is deemed ready, Arencibia is traded or becomes a part-timer or backup.

Adam Lind had a terrific first half, but injuries to his back and wrist ruined what looked like it was going to be a repeat of his massive 2008 season in which he was a blossoming star.

Lind will hit 25 homers and 30-40 doubles; he strikes out a lot and adjusted well to a new position at first base. The Blue Jays could use a more consistent and threatening bat behind Jose Bautista than what Lind has been in the past two seasons. He’s more suited to batting sixth than fourth.

Kelly Johnson was acquired from the Diamondbacks for Aaron Hill in a trade of two disappointing players who, in the past, have shown better production than what they were giving to their former teams.

Johnson has 20+ homer power, provides 30+ doubles, and will steal a few bases while playing good defense at second base. He walks a fair amount and strikes out a lot. Since 2009, he’s alternated good and bad seasons with the Braves and Diamondbacks. He had a .781 OPS in 33 games with the Blue Jays after the trade.

Brett Lawrie was acquired from the Brewers for Shaun Marcum before the 2011 season and spent the first four months of the season in Triple-A Las Vegas demolishing the Pacific Coast League to the tune of a .353 average, .415 on base and 18 homers. He was scheduled to be recalled earlier in the season before he was hit on the hand with a pitch and delayed. Once he got to the big leagues, he made it clear that he had no intention of ever going back down.

He had 9 homers with a .953 OPS in 171 plate appearances. He’s a fine defensive third baseman and can play second as well. At 22, he’s brimming with confidence and is poised to become an entrenched entity for the Blue Jays and an All-Star.

After being driven out of Atlanta by Bobby Cox and the Braves’ veterans because of his frequent gaffes and selfish behaviors, Yunel Escobar has found a home in Toronto.

He signed a contract extension for 2-years (2012-2013) at $10 million and the club holds options for $5 million annually in both 2014 and 2015. If Escobar plays the solid defense and hits as he did in 2011, he’ll be a ridiculous bargain. He had 11 homers, 24 doubles and a .782 OPS in 133 games last season and could be even better as he matures.

25-year-old, lefty-swinging outfielder Eric Thames took over in left field after Juan Rivera was traded and Travis Snider was demoted; Thames hit 12 homers in 394 plate appearances. He strikes out a lot, but has shown some on base skills. He struggled badly against lefties as a rookie batting .209, so he might be platooned in 2012.

Colby Rasmus was being torn in multiple directions while with the Cardinals. His drafting was questioned by the old-school people in the front office who chafed at the new school thinkers who were brought in and seen as unwanted interlopers; his father Tony openly interfered with the way the Cardinals wanted Colby to hit; Albert Pujols called him out for his perceived whining and unhappiness when it got out that he’d asked to be traded; and Tony LaRussa didn’t want to play him.

The Cardinals made a series of drastic trades at mid-season and dealt Rasmus to the Blue Jays.

That they won the World Series after Rasmus was gone has resulted in the specious reasoning that it was Rasmus who was the problem and once he was gone, everything fell into place for the Cardinals.

Of course, it’s ludicrous. The Cardinals wouldn’t have made the playoffs had the Braves not collapsed.

Rasmus wasn’t a clubhouse problem because of personality, lack of ability or attitude. He was a clubhouse problem because he was caught in the middle of a war zone between multiple parties and couldn’t deal with the pressure to perform amid the shots being fired over his head.

He’s 25 and it’s not easy to be a coach’s son and live an enabled life with the game coming easy and then be the rope in a tug-of-war.

He’s better off with the Blue Jays.

Are the Blue Jays better off with him?

Rasmus batted .173 after joining the Blue Jays, but he battled a wrist injury and missed most of September.

He showed his ability in 2010 as he had an .859 OPS and 23 homers in 144 games. He had good power numbers and on base skills in the minors and is a solid, if not spectacular bat with pop. If the Blue Jays simply tell him that he’s going to be their everyday center fielder and leave him alone, he’ll be fine.

Jose Bautista proved that his 2010 season—in which he hit 54 home runs—was not a fluke with another 43 homers in 2011 to lead the American League. He also led the league in walks, slugging percentage and OPS.

Because of the bizarre and overaggressive way in which manager Farrell allows his runners to try to steal bases and self-defeating lineup decisions, Bautista only drove in 103 runs with those 43 homers. For a hitter who’s on base 44% of the time, Bautista only scored 105 runs.

This is nowhere near enough and if the team is going to take advantage of the basher that Joey Bats has become, they have to bat him fourth and surround him with hitters who get on base in front of him and won’t try to steal bases for no reason to risk running them out of innings. They need hitters behind him who can and will drive him in.

As for Bautista himself, he’s become one of the most dangerous hitters in baseball and is a good choice for the MVP.

Edwin Encarnacion may have had an epiphany in the second half of the 2011 season when he batted .291 with a .383 on base percentage and 11 homers. For the season, he hit 17 homers and had an .787 OPS. Encarnacion has always had All-Star talent and was so oblivious to his surroundings that two of the most patient managers in recent baseball memory—Dusty Baker and Cito Gaston—wanted to strangle him.

He’s listed as the Blue Jays DH for 2012, but I’d hesitate to think that he’s going to continue the good work that he showed over the final few months of last season only because he’s Edwin Encarnacion and it’s in his DNA to aggravate, tease and regress.


Veteran righty-swinging outfielder Ben Francisco was acquired from the Phillies and will see plenty of at bats as a possible platoon partner for Thames and occasional DH. Francsico has 10-15 home run power if he gets significant at bats; he can steal a few bases and doesn’t strike out much.

Jeff Mathis was acquired from the Angels as a defensively-minded backup to Arencibia. Mathis can’t hit—he’s a .194 career hitter—but he can handle a pitching staff and in a strange twist, hits really well in the post-season. The Blue Jays only hope that they have the opportunity to see Mathis become a different player in October.

Travis Snider has received every opportunity to stake a claim in the Blue Jays’ lineup, but hasn’t grabbed and run with it. The 6’0”, 240 pound Snider has posted good power/on base numbers in the minors, but has yet to show much in the big leagues. With the Blue Jays’ DH spot in flux, he might get another chance in 2012. He’s only 24, so there’s time for him to right himself.

Rajai Davis is a backup outfielder who stole 34 bases in 95 games for the Blue Jays in 2011. He can play all three outfield positions and has hit well in the past when given a chance to play semi-regularly.

Mike McCoy is a 31-year-old, journeyman utility player who can’t really hit (career big league average of .194), but can play multiple positions well and has a good eye at the plate. He also stole 12 bases in 80 games last season.


The Blue Jays 2012 season will come down to a series of “ifs”.

If manager John Farrell takes his foot off the gas with the ridiculous stolen bases and does a better job of running his offense…

If the young pitchers Morrow, Alvarez, Cecil and Drabek slot in solidly behind Romero…

If the “good” Johnson and Encarnacion show up…

If Lawrie and Rasmus continue their development…

If Lind is healthy and hits somewhere close to as he did in the first half of last season…

If Santos is able to close for a team with designs on contention…

If the Red Sox and Rays are downgraded enough for the Blue Jays to slip past them…

If, if, if.

The Blue Jays are very talented and have many questions surrounding them. This is why they would be a legitimate playoff choice if they’d gotten another proven basher to team with Bautista in the middle of the lineup and if they’d gotten a legitimate, frontline starting pitcher.

But they didn’t.

So they’re left with the multitude of “ifs”.

I wanted to pick the Blue Jays to make the playoffs or enter the last week of the season with a chance to make the playoffs in 2012, but when the “improvements” are limited to Santos, Cordero, Mathis, Oliver and a lot of hope, I can’t pick them to surpass the big guns in the American League.

The extra Wild Card team is giving teams like the Blue Jays an opening that wasn’t there before, so if they get into the mid-80s with their win total, they’ve got a legitimate shot of getting in and once they’re in, they have the components—young pitching, a deep bullpen and that mauler Bautista—to put a scare into anyone.

If they’re in contention at mid-season, they’re going to have the minor league talent to make a big acquisition at the deadline along the lines of David Wright or Matt Garza, but that’s not going to come to pass until June or July.

As of right now, they’re hovering between the innocent climb from 81-81 mediocrity to 90+ wins and playoff contention.

It could go both ways and they’re going to wind up somewhere in the middle of those two conclusions.


The above is a clip from my book Paul Lebowitz’s 2012 Baseball Guide.

It’s available on Kindle, Lulu, Nook and Smashwords with other outlets on the way.


Ryan “The Hebrew Hammer” Braun Wins by Split-Decision

All Star Game, Ballparks, Basketball, Books, CBA, Draft, Fantasy/Roto, Games, Hall Of Fame, History, Hot Stove, Management, Media, MVP, Paul Lebowitz's 2011 Baseball Guide, PEDs, Players, Playoffs, Politics, Spring Training, Stats, Trade Rumors, World Series

You’ll hear both sides debate the Ryan Braun drug test issue like the conservatives who think guilty is guilty regardless of how the evidence is gathered and liberals ranting and raving that the rights of the innocent are protected when the rights of the guilty are upheld.

Did Braun take a substance to help his performance or did he get caught using something else that wasn’t a PED, but was on the list?

It all goes back to the fine print of the rules and the clumsy, self-serving, stupid way this whole case was handled.

You can read it in detail here on; briefly, here’s what it comes down to:

  • Braun took a urine test.
  • There was no nearby FedEx center open for the test administrator to drop the sample off, so he took it home and stored it in his fridge.
  • He shipped it on the next Monday.
  • There was no evidence of tampering on the sample, nor to the bag in which it had been placed.
  • Braun had elevated levels of testosterone and failed the test.
  • But then, the story was leaked.

The final bulletpoint is the key to the whole thing.

Braun had rights. Those rights were undermined. That fact has made this an important decision to stop the prevalent whispers that come out in what’s supposed to be a confidential process.

Baseball can proclaim that the revelation of the 2003 list of PED failures helped bring about a “cleaning up” of the game; that in the end, something good came out of the failure to adhere to the rights of the players who, in spite of their supposed guilt, shouldn’t have had their failed tests revealed in the first place.

The union should’ve destroyed the list and didn’t, so it’s their own fault.

But everyone—players, agents, union reps, front office people, owners and MLB executives—were either directly involved in the PED use or just let it go for their own ends.

Once the groundswell of protests at records being demolished and dwarfed, they reacted.

It’s pure marketing and pandering to customer desires: they wanted more scoring, they got more scoring; as people got angry at the overt manner of players bulking up and shattering records, baseball outlawed steroids and HGH and started testing for them.

It’s similar to the angry reactions to repeated stories on ESPN and other “sports news” outlets for continually talking about Tim Tebow and Jeremy Lin regardless of whether the players warrant that level of coverage—it’s what the paying customers want.

Confronted with a public outcry and governmental intervention at activities that it both tacitly encouraged and turned a blind eye to, baseball enacted testing and levied harsh penalties for using a list of drugs that might or might not have been prototypical “performance enhancers”.

Is there a place for, “Well, he was guilty anyway so what’s the difference?”

In reality, yes, there is a place for that.

But in the legal system where Braun is part of a union and the union and regulating committee have entered into a binding agreement as to how it should be handled and Braun is vehemently voicing his innocence and won’t back down, there was no choice other than to exonerate him.

The rules of the treatment and testing program can be read here on a PDF file.

When would it end if innuendo, speculation and public response were the determinative factors in whether an individual saw his reputation and ability to make a living compromised by something that hadn’t been handled properly? If one link in the chain is corrupted, the whole thing has to be tossed out.

Braun and every player in the MLB Players Association have rights—rights that were negotiated and are legally binding.

He’s the reigning National League MVP and the validity and perception of his entire career up to now hinged on this decision. If there was any doubt as to its accuracy, he had to be found not guilty.

When the union agreed to the testing program in order to keep labor peace and “clean up” the game, there was no provision that a failed test would be out in the media five months in advance of his hearing so the player had to hide in his home and keep silent on an allegation that he denied.

Being innocent until proven guilty is relevant and if baseball is angry at someone, they should be angry at whomever decided it was a good idea to let the media know that Braun failed the test in the first place because since the other procedures—agreed to by the union—had been followed, the tipping point was that the public knew about Braun’s failed test before his appeal had been heard.

If it hadn’t been leaked, Braun would undoubtedly have lost his case.

It isn’t so much that Braun is “innocent”, it’s that people with knowledge need to keep their mouths shut. If there’s anyone to blame, it’s the person who leaked the story to begin with.

Don’t think that these dropped nuggets aren’t intentional and strategic in an attempt to preclude a player from winning a case such as this and it was the overthinking and attempts to be clever on the part of baseball that has again sabotaged their attempts to be aboveboard.

It was a circular circumstance that got Braun off.

It’s appropriate because there are few entities that are as adept at the circular firing squad as Major League Baseball.


Jeremy Lin, Media Stereotyping and Unfunny Stupidity

Basketball, Games, Management, Media, Players, Prospects

This Jeremy Lin phenomenon has been taking a dark turn with the ridiculous racial undertones that are permeating the reporting. It’s gotten so that people are double and triple checking their statements to make sure that they didn’t unintentionally or inadvertently use the wrong words and be viewed as racist or stereotyping.

The ESPN headline below from Sunday morning was foolish and probably a joke that was not intended to be published. It got someone fired from their job.

Jason Whitlock of Fox Sports said the following on Twitter:

Some lucky lady in NYC is gonna feel a couple inches of pain tonight.

It’s one thing to say something offensive to get yourself into trouble if it’s at least funny, but the stuff that’s coming out isn’t even remotely funny. They’re pathetic.

And here’s the thing about Lin: Lin is Asian, but he’s also an American.

He’s from Northern California, talks like he’s from Northern California, and went to Harvard. If he was a stereotypical immigrant and behaved like an over-the-top exchange student like Gedde Watanabe as Long Duk Dong in Sixteen Candles, then there might be something to chuckle about in the cheap humor. That doesn’t mean people wouldn’t get into trouble, but at least it might be worthy of a laugh.

But the repeated references to Lin’s ethnicity are straddling and crossing the line of taste and offensiveness for no reason. It’s said that he’s “Asian-American”, but he’s as American as any other American playing in the NBA. He just happens to have Taiwanese parents.

It’s an unnecessary distraction from a great story and there’s plenty of stupid to go around.


Cameron vs Puckett—*Wink Wink*

All Star Game, Ballparks, Basketball, Books, CBA, Draft, Fantasy/Roto, Free Agents, Games, Hall Of Fame, History, Hot Stove, Management, Media, MVP, PEDs, Players, Playoffs, Politics, Spring Training, Stats, Trade Rumors, World Series

Following his retirement, I saw it repeated ad nauseam that Mike Cameron has a higher career WAR (Wins Above Replacement) than Kirby Puckett.

What the implication of the “higher WAR” for Cameron suggests is anyone’s guess because they won’t come out and specifically say it.

I’m not grasping the random, silly comparison between two different players who have very little in common apart from both being center fielders.

But why pick on Puckett? Couldn’t they compare Cameron to a player with whom he has comparable stats according to Baseball-Reference’s comparison metric at the bottom of each player’s page?

Cameron’s comps are the likes of Jimmy Wynn (the Toy Cannon—great nickname), Tom Brunansky, Bobby Murcer, Chet Lemon, and Torii Hunter.

Puckett’s similar players are Don Mattingly, Cecil Cooper, Magglio Ordonez, Kiki Cuyler (the only Hall of Famer along with Puckett) and Tony Oliva.

The big problem that Puckett has is that he was elected to the Hall of Fame while probably being an “outside looking in” player had he retired of his own volition rather than because of glaucoma.

Was it sympathy? Was it a projection of what he “would” have done had he not had such a devastating career ending?

If they’re going down that road, the argument could be made that Mattingly should also be a Hall of Famer because of his injured back that robbed him of his power.

If Puckett is overrated, then so is Larry Walker who had similar home/road splits as Puckett did. And stat people push Walker for the Hall of Fame.

Walker hit .381 for his career at Coors Field. The next best number per ballpark was in Montreal’s Olympic Stadium where he had a slash line of .293/.373/.518.

After that was his other home park of Busch Stadium late in his career where he posted a .294/.391/.536.

Good but not all world or in the realm of ridiculous as his Coors Field numbers are.

The crux of the wink wink/nod nod argument is that Cameron’s career WAR was 46.7 and Puckett’s was 44.8.

Yes, I suppose technically Cameron had a “higher” WAR than Puckett, but since the people who reference WAR treat it as the end-all/be-all of analytical existence, wouldn’t it be prudent to mention that Cameron played in 5 more seasons than Puckett did to accumulate that total?

If you’d like to go by WAR, Cameron’s highest season WAR was 6.4 and his average, per season was 2.7.

Puckett’s highest WAR was 7.2 and his average was 3.7.

The aforementioned Walker had a career WAR of 67.3, but his numbers were severely bolstered by playing in the pinball machine of Coors Field in his prime. Plus there were suggestions that Walker’s power wasn’t all natural and, considering the era, everyone’s a suspect.

The only thing Puckett used in excess were cheeseburgers.

Here’s the reality, statistically and otherwise, with Cameron vs Puckett:

  • Cameron was an all-world defensive center fielder; Puckett won 6 Gold Gloves and his statistical defensive decline coincided with his burst of power in 1986. As a contemporary of Devon White and Gary Pettis, Puckett didn’t deserve the Gold Gloves.
  • Puckett batted .318 for his career with a .360 OBP and .477 slugging. Cameron’s slash line was .249/.338/.444.
  • Puckett hit 207 homers and stole 134 bases. Cameron had 278 homers and stole 297 bases.
  • Puckett averaged 88 strikeouts a season. Cameron averaged 158 strikeouts a season.
  • Puckett won 6 Silver Slugger Awards and batted above .314 eight times in his twelve year career. Cameron’s career high average was .273.
  • Puckett had a career OPS of .837. Cameron’s was .782. Puckett’s OPS+ (which accounts for ballpark factor) was 124. Cameron’s was 105.
  • In Game 6 of the 1991 World Series, Puckett made a great catch in center field to rob Ron Gant of an extra base hit, went 3 for 4 at the plate and hit a game-winning homer to send the series to a decisive Game 7, which the Twins won.
  • Puckett won two World Series with the Twins and batted .309 with 5 post-season homers. Cameron batted .174 in 112 post season plate appearances with 1 home run.

What’s the comparison here?

There is none.

Puckett and Cameron not only shouldn’t be compared, they shouldn’t even be mentioned in the same sentence.

So what’s the point?

I’m not sure because they won’t say it. All they’ll utter are interjections like “WOW!!!” followed by the indirect suggestion that Cameron was better than Puckett.

I think.

Are they saying that Cameron was better than Puckett? That Puckett was overrated and Cameron was underrated? And if they’re trying to say something to the tune of either argument, why not just come out and say it? Why does it have to be danced around like a clumsy, worn out ballerina with the kindasorta suggestion of what’s being said without it actually being said?

I don’t know.

This is why those who aren’t immersed in numbers can’t take seriously those who use statistics as the final arbiter of all discussions. They use them when they’re convenient to their argument, leave out context and then avoid saying what they’re trying to say to avoid the attacks of people like me who don’t want to hear such silliness.

But I said it anyway.

Puckett was better than Cameron. Period.


What Jeremy Lin Can Teach Us

All Star Game, Ballparks, Basketball, Books, CBA, Cy Young Award, Draft, Fantasy/Roto, Free Agents, Games, Hall Of Fame, History, Hot Stove, Management, Media, MiLB, MLB Trade Deadline, MLB Waiver Trades, Movies, MVP, Paul Lebowitz's 2011 Baseball Guide, PEDs, Players, Playoffs, Politics, Prospects, Spring Training, Stats, Trade Rumors, Umpires, World Series

Everyone’s jumping on the Jeremy Lin bandwagon.

Hey, even I’m doing it and I don’t know anything about basketball and can’t watch the games because of the ongoing dispute between Time Warner and MSG.

If I could, I wouldn’t know what I was watching and wouldn’t claim to.

But there are two pieces in today’s NY Times that are discussing Lin’s rise from obscurity, journeyman status, the Ivy League, bad scouting and possibly a bit of stereotyping because he’s of Asian-American descent (by way of Northern California). He’s not a prototypical basketball player who’s easy to explain with buzzwords. Those buzzwords are phrased in such a way that few are willing to dispute them because they’re so encompassing and easy to use as adjectives whether they’re meaningful or not.

In one piece, Lin’s failure to attract attention as a high school and college player is discussed—link.

In the other, Nate Silver dissects Lin statistically—link.

The mistakes that were made with Lin are common and happen not just in sports but in all endeavors.

The words “can’t” and “never been done before” are limiting and hinder those with the ability to accomplish their goals. They’re exacerbated if the individual is saddled with an absence of self-confidence or determination to keep moving forward in the face of such negativity. Because Lin continued to try and wasn’t looking for the validation of others to let him think he had a chance to succeed, he hung around and when he received his opportunity, ran with it while holding and passing and shooting a basketball—very well by the looks of things.

In baseball this happens all the time as well.

How many times have we seen a player who wasn’t considered a prospect because of ingrained beliefs that were more of a safety net than legitimate analysis?

People want to keep their jobs and a major part of that for a conventional organization is playing it safe and having an explanation for why they do what they do.

“He had a 100-mph fastball.”

“He’s a 6’3”, 190 pound righty with a clean motion and great upside.”

“He’s a tools guy.”

They’re excuses.

One of the reasons Moneyball struck such a nerve wasn’t that it seemed to work for awhile, but because the players who would’ve been shunned in the past were given an opportunity out of the A’s desperation to find players who could help them at an affordable price. What went wrong was when the concept spun out of control to mean, as a baseline, that rather than looking for players who could play, everyone was supposed to find fat players who took a lot of pitches and drew walks at the expense of other attributes.

The infamous, “not trying to sell jeans” catchphrase became part of the lexicon to explain why a player was taken and it took on the same context of the opposite “reasons” (excuses) listed above.

Old school and new school became interchangeable in stupidity, self-aggrandizement and tribalism.

Suddenly, everyone who could calculate a player’s on base percentage or strikeout rate in the minors was qualified to advise Tony LaRussa and Joe Torre on how to run their teams.

And they did.

And it didn’t go well.

It’s happened repeatedly in baseball that a player like Tim Lincecum was passed over because of his uniqueness of motion, training and diminutive stature, but became a star because there was one team—the Giants—willing to adhere to the rules laid out by Lincecum’s father and judged him by his results rather than that he’s a “freak”.

Lesser known players have benefited from this phenomenon.

Mike Jacobs isn’t a great player, but he was a non-prospect for the Mets and wound up with a decent career because he was called up as an emergency catcher in 1995, batted as a pinch hitter on a Sunday game in which the Mets were losing, hit a home run and had to have Pedro Martinez stand up for him for the Mets to keep him around rather than send him back to the minors. The Mets put him in the lineup at first base and he kept hitting home runs.

Jacobs went from a 38th round pick and “organizational filler” to a big leaguer that was the centerpiece in the Mets acquisition of Carlos Delgado from the Marlins after the 2005 season.

Jacobs hit 100 homers in his big league career and is still hanging around as an extra player who’s been in the big leagues, can hit the ball out of the park once in a while and be a competent bench player who can catch in an emergency. (He’s going to camp with the Diamondbacks on a minor league contract.)

Martinez himself had been misjudged by then-Dodgers manager Tommy Lasorda and the team doctors as too small and fragile to be a durable and consistent long-term starting pitcher. He was a reliever as a rookie and was traded for Delino DeShields following the 1993 season.

DeShields happened to be a good player, but he was traded for one of the best pitchers in history and that’s not his fault.

The lack of comprehension surrounding Moneyball and its subsequent offshoots isn’t that people didn’t “get” what Michael Lewis was trying to highlight, but that they took it as the new way of running a club at the expense of old-school scouting techniques and gut instincts that have to be part of the game.

Because they had a bunch of players who would be keys to a “Rocky”-style story with “There’s a Place for Us” by Barbra Streisand playing in the background as the group of misfits—one with a clubfoot (Jim Mecir); one throwing slow underarm junk (Chad Bradford); a former star on his way out (David Justice); and a former catcher who couldn’t throw and never had a chance to play (Scott Hatteberg); along with the fat players they drafted—celebrated a championship and shoved it into the faces of the big kids who never let them play.

They never won a championship, but that’s secondary to the perception and salesmanship.

Lin is getting attention now; there are going to be Lin jerseys popping up all over the place and he’s the toast of New York as an inspiration to those who are waiting for their chance and won’t quit.

He’s also going to have a lot of people who bypassed him contacting him to apologize, admit they were wrong, asking for things or hoping for Lin to say, “it’s okay, you’re not an idiot”.

But what if they are idiots? What if they are so dogmatic and invested in safety-first drafting/signing that they ignored what was right in front of their faces and are under siege because of that?

Is there a stat for scouts and executives screwing up and missing on players that could actually play, but weren’t allowed to for one reason or another?

If not, there should be one because there are Jeremy Lins everywhere waiting for someone in power to take a chance on them. There are opportunities to come up big if a team is smart or lucky or both. It all depends on who’s smart enough, gutsy enough or desperate enough to give those players that chance.

It’s random, but it counts all the same.